E. Doyle et al., COMPARISON OF PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA WITH AND WITHOUT A BACKGROUND INFUSION AFTER LOWER ABDOMINAL-SURGERY IN CHILDREN, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 71(5), 1993, pp. 670-673
Forty children aged 6-12 yr undergoing appendicectomy were allocated r
andomly to receive post-operative iv. morphine by a patient-controlled
analgesia (PCA) system (bolus dose 20 mug kg-1 with a lockout interva
l of 5 min) or the same PCA with a background infusion of morphine 20
mug kg-1 h-1. Patients breathed air and oxygen saturation was monitore
d by continuous pulse oximetry. Scores for pain, sedation and nausea w
ere recorded hourly. Patients with PCA + background infusion received
significantly more morphine than those with PCA only. Both groups self
-administered similar amounts of morphine using the PCA machine. There
were no significant differences in the pain scores of the two groups.
Patients with PCA + background infusion suffered more nausea (P < 0.0
1), more sedation (P < 0.05) and hypoxaemia (P < 0.001) than those wit
h PCA only. They also had a better sleep pattern than those with PCA o
nly.