Kb. Armitage et al., UROSEPSIS IN THE ELDERLY - CLINICAL AND MICROBIOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS, Infectious diseases in clinical practice, 2(4), 1993, pp. 260-266
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Infectious Diseases",Immunology,"Medicine, General & Internal
We reviewed 105 patients age 65 or older who were admitted with ''uros
epsis,'' which we defined as urinary tract infection plus at least one
of the following: fever (temperature >38-degrees-C), hypothermia (tem
perature <35.5-degrees-C), hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm
Hg), or change in mental status. Blood cultures were positive in 50%;
bacteremia was predicted only by the presence of hypotension (P < .05
), but this sign was not sensitive enough to exclude bacteremia in pat
ients without hypotension. One hundred (95%) were infected with a gram
-negative rod; of these, 53 were Escherichia coli, of which 12 (22%) w
ere resistant to ampicillin. Of the 47 non-E. coli gram-negative rods,
26 (56%) were ampicillin resistant. Sixteen of the 100 gram-negative
rods were resistant to multiple antibiotics. Stepwise logistic regress
ion analysis showed recent hospital admission and nursing home residen
ce to be independent predictors of infection with multiply resistant g
ram-negative rods (P < .01). No factors were predictive of infection w
ith ampicillin-resistant gram-negative rods. We conclude that bacterem
ia and resistance to ampicillin were common and unpredictable in elder
ly patients admitted with urosepsis but that a subset of patients at r
isk for multiply resistant gram-negative rods may be identified at the
time of admission.