BASE SELECTION, PROOFREADING, AND MISMATCH REPAIR DURING DNA-REPLICATION IN ESCHERICHIA-COLI

Authors
Citation
Rm. Schaaper, BASE SELECTION, PROOFREADING, AND MISMATCH REPAIR DURING DNA-REPLICATION IN ESCHERICHIA-COLI, The Journal of biological chemistry, 268(32), 1993, pp. 23762-23765
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Biology
ISSN journal
00219258
Volume
268
Issue
32
Year of publication
1993
Pages
23762 - 23765
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9258(1993)268:32<23762:BSPAMR>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
The accuracy by which organisms duplicate their DNA is of considerable interest. At least three mechanisms operate, serially, to secure high fidelity: base selection, exonucleolytic proofreading, and postreplic ative mismatch correction. To obtain insights into the efficiency and specificity of these steps in the bacterium Escherichia coli, we have performed DNA sequence analysis of mutations occurring in the bacteria l lacI gene in a series of strains genetically disabled in one or more of these error avoidance pathways. The base selection efficiency was estimated from mutagenesis occurring in a mutDmutL strain, which is de ficient in both proofreading (mutD5) and mismatch repair (mutL). The p roofreading efficiency was derived comparing the mutD5 mutL strain to the mismatch repair-deficient mutL strain. The efficiency of mismatch repair was derived comparing the mutL strain to the wild-type strain. The results show that base selection discriminates against errors by 2 00,000-2,000,000-fold, proofreading by 40-200-fold, and mismatch repai r by 20-400-fold, each depending on the type of error. Base selection and proofreading act more strongly against transversions than transiti ons, whereas mismatch repair does the opposite. The data are based on 866 sequenced lacI mutations in a target that allows the scoring of at least 127 different mutations in 76 distinct DNA sequence contexts in vivo. They may therefore have general significance.