Ff. Dasilva et al., HYDRAULIC-PROPERTIES OF SPHAGNUM PEAT MOSS AND TUFF (SCORIA) AND THEIR POTENTIAL EFFECTS ON WATER AVAILABILITY, Plant and soil, 154(1), 1993, pp. 119-126
The potential rate of water and nutrient supply to plant roots depends
on the hydraulic properties of the container medium (growth medium, s
ubstrate), primarily on its unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, which
is a measure of the medium's resistance to water flow. Water availabil
ity to plants grown in containers is usually being evaluated using cri
teria based exclusively on water characteristic curves of the medium i
n which the plant is grown. This approach is challenged in the present
paper. We hypothise that the coarse structure of peat moss as well as
of other container media may result in a sharp decrease in hydraulic
conductivity, as the water content of peat is reduced. Transient chang
es in unsaturated hydraulic conductivity may result in reduced water u
ptake by plant roots. The objectives of this research were to determin
e the hydraulic properties of sphagnum peat moss and to evaluate their
potential effects on water availability. Tuff (granulated volcanic as
h) and its mix with peat were also tested for comparison. Water charac
teristic curves (drying and wetting cycles) and saturated hydraulic co
nductivity were measured. A predictive mathematical model was used to
calculate the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of the media. Measure
d water retention and saturated hydraulic conductivity data were used
to estimate model parameters by a nonlinear least-squares curve-fittin
g technique. Model predictions of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity w
ere validated by direct measurements. Results showed that,sharp variat
ions in hydraulic conductivity occur in a very narrow suction range (0
-2.5 kPa). In this range a decrease of more than three orders of magni
tude in the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity was observed for peat.
A similar trend was observed for the other media tested. This suggests
that the approach that has been commonly used for determinations of w
ater availability and for irrigation scheduling in container media may
provide inaccurate predictions as to potential plant response.