Different vehicles of transmission of the same pathogen may induce dif
ferent clinical manifestations of the disease. The hypothesis was test
ed that the clinical manifestation of food-borne streptococcal pharyng
itis is different hom air-borne streptococcal pharyngitis. The symptom
s and signs of 77 patients with endemic air-borne streptococcal pharyn
gitis compared to 103 patients with epidemic food-borne streptococcal
pharyngitis (T type 8/25/imp19, M protein negative) and 11 patients wi
th secondary air-borne epidemic streptococcal pharyngitis (T type 8/25
/imp19, M protein negative) were prospectively evaluated. The patients
with food-borne streptococcal pharyngitis had a significantly higher
frequency of sore throat, fever, pharyngeal erythema, tonsillar enlarg
ement and submandibular lymphadenopathy and a lower frequency of coryz
a and cough compared to the patients,vith endemic air-borne streptococ
cal pharyngitis. Although both food-borne and airborne streptococcal i
nfection caused upper respiratory tract infection, the clinical manife
station of food-borne streptococcal pharyngitis was more severe and mo
re confined to the pharynx compared to the endemic air-borne disease,
Involvement of the nasal mucosa and bronchial tree was more common in
air-borne streptococcal pharyngitis than in the food-borne disease.