LOCAL-CONTROL IN MEDICALLY INOPERABLE LUNG-CANCER - AN ANALYSIS OF ITS IMPORTANCE IN OUTCOME AND FACTORS DETERMINING THE PROBABILITY OF TUMOR-ERADICATION
De. Dosoretz et al., LOCAL-CONTROL IN MEDICALLY INOPERABLE LUNG-CANCER - AN ANALYSIS OF ITS IMPORTANCE IN OUTCOME AND FACTORS DETERMINING THE PROBABILITY OF TUMOR-ERADICATION, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 27(3), 1993, pp. 507-516
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: For patients who are medically unable to tolerate a surgical
resection for technically resectable non-small-cell lung carcinoma, ra
diation therapy is an acceptable alternative. We report on the effect
of achieving local control of the primary tumor on survival end-points
, and analyze factors that may influence local control. Methods and Ma
terials: We reviewed the records of 152 patients with medically inoper
able non-small-cell lung carcinoma treated at our institutions. All pa
tients had technically resectable lesions and no evidence of metastati
c disease. Treatment was delivered using megavoltage irradiation to do
ses ranging from 45 to 75 Gy. Results: For patients with tumors 3 cm o
r less, locally controlling the tumor significantly improved survival
(p = .0371). Patients with Tl tumors had a higher probability of survi
val and disease-free-survival than patients with larger tumors if the
primary tumor was locally controlled, but this survival advantage disa
ppeared if the tumor was not controlled. Overall, patients with smalle
r tumors had a lower incidence of distant spread, but this association
was maintained only when the primary tumor was controlled (36 month r
isk of 10%, 23%, and 57% for tumors < 3 cm, 3-4.9 cm, 5 cm or greater,
respectively, p = .0027). For patients whose tumors were not controll
ed, there was no significant difference in the risk of distant dissemi
nation by tumor size. Higher radiation doses influenced local control
and metastatic spread. We observed no influence of the initial field s
ize in the risk of local control and in the probability of survival. C
onclusion: Radical radiation therapy is an effective treatment for sma
ll (T1 or < 3 cm) tumors when treated to doses of 65 Gy or more, and s
hould be offered as an alternative to surgery in elderly or infirm pat
ients. New therapeutic strategies to improve the local control rate sh
ould be considered for larger tumors, through the use of hyperfraction
ated treatment, endobronchial ''boost'' irradiation, and sensitizing c
hemotherapy agents.