Bg. Haffty et al., LOCAL RECURRENCE VERSUS NEW PRIMARY - CLINICAL ANALYSIS OF 82 BREAST RELAPSES AND POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS FOR GENETIC FINGERPRINTING, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 27(3), 1993, pp. 575-583
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to perform a detailed clinical
pathological analysis of breast relapses in patients treated with cons
ervative surgery and radiation therapy in an effort to classify those
relapses as true local recurrences or second primary tumors, and to as
sess the prognostic and therapeutic implications of such a classificat
ion system. Methods and Materials: Of 990 patients treated with conser
vative surgery and radiation therapy at our facilities prior to Decemb
er 1987, 82 patients have experienced a relapse in the conservatively
treated breast as the primary site of failure. Patients were classifie
d as having new primary tumors if they fulfilled any one of the follow
ing criteria: a) breast relapse occurring at a site distinctly removed
from the original tumor; b) histology of the breast relapse compared
with the original tumor consistent with a new primary; or c) DNA flow
cytometry converting from an aneuploid primary to a diploid relapse. R
esults: As of 2/92, with a median follow-up of 5.4 years from the time
of breast relapse, the overall 5-year survival rate following breast
relapse was 55%. Forty-seven patients were classified as true recurren
ces and 33 patients were classified as new primaries. Patients classif
ied as true recurrences had a shorter median time to breast relapse th
an patients classified as new primaries (3.16 years vs.5.42 years, p <
.05) and an inferior post breast recurrence survival rate compared to
patients classified as new primaries (36% vs.89%, p < .05). Residual
disease outside of the recurrent tumor bed was also noted to be more f
requent in patients classified as true recurrences compared to patient
s classified as new primaries (48% vs.16%, p < .05). Conclusion: Based
on the clinical and pathological criteria outlined, it appears that a
significant portion of patients experiencing a relapse in the conserv
atively treated breast may have new primary tumors as opposed to true
local relapses. Distinction between a true recurrence and a new primar
y tumor may have significant prognostic implications. Uncertainties as
sociated with the clinical and pathological criteria are presented and
further investigations with genetic fingerprinting techniques to esta
blish the clonality of breast relapses are presented and discussed.