PRESERVATION OF PAROTID FUNCTION AFTER EXTERNAL-BEAM IRRADIATION IN HEAD AND NECK-CANCER PATIENTS - A FEASIBILITY STUDY USING 3-DIMENSIONALTREATMENT PLANNING
Mb. Hazuka et al., PRESERVATION OF PAROTID FUNCTION AFTER EXTERNAL-BEAM IRRADIATION IN HEAD AND NECK-CANCER PATIENTS - A FEASIBILITY STUDY USING 3-DIMENSIONALTREATMENT PLANNING, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 27(3), 1993, pp. 731-737
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: Radiation-induced xerostomia is a frequent complication and m
ajor cause of morbidity in head and neck cancer patients. The severity
of xerostomia is related to radiation dose and the amount of parotid
tissue included in the irradiated volume. To reduce this side-effect a
nd preserve salivary function, we have evaluated the use of 3-dimensio
nal (3-D) treatment planning to spare the contralateral parotid gland
in twelve patients undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck canc
ers. Methods and Materials: In each case, beam's eye view displays wer
e used to design beam and blocking arrangements that excluded the cont
ralateral parotid. Ten patients were treated with 2 nonopposing obliqu
e fields in the axial and non-axial plane while two patients required
a non-axial, non-coplanar 3-field arrangement. These 3-D treatment pla
ns were also compared with conventional 2-dimensional (2-D) plans. The
2-dimensional plans were designed independently of the 3-D treatment
planning information using the orthogonal radiographs and hard copies
of the computed tomography scans. Results: An average of 1.8% (range,
0-7%) of the target volume was underdosed with the 95% isodose level f
or the 3-D plans compared with 18.8% (range, 2.0-36.6%) for the 2-D pl
ans. This was due to improved identification of the target volumes and
better design of blocked fields with beam's eye view treatment planni
ng. Furthermore, the mean dose to the opposite parotid was 3.9 Gy for
the 3-D plans vs. 28.9 Gy for the conventional plans. With a minimum f
ollow-up of 4 months, only 2 of 12 patients have complained of a dry m
outh. Conclusion: These encouraging results suggest that this approach
is feasible in many cases. 3-D treatment planning may allow the use o
f parotid sparing techniques in patients who otherwise would not have
been considered candidates using conventional radiotherapy techniques.