Bm. Ure et al., PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA FOR POSTOPER ATIVE PAIN RELIEF - PROSPECTIVE-STUDY ON TECHNOLOGY FOR MEDICAL-SURGICAL INPATIENTS, Chirurg, 64(10), 1993, pp. 802-808
Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is rarely used on surgical wards de
spite described advantages of this method as compared to conventional
techniques. Uncertainties in patient selection and insufficient evalua
tion of this technique may explain these circumstances. The aim of our
study was to evaluate PCA on general surgery and traumatology wards b
y means of standardized criteria for technology assessment (i. e. safe
ty, practicability, benefit for patients and medical staff) and the ef
ficacy of pain relief. In a prospective study we investigated 120 pati
ents. In phase I, we performed analgesic therapy with tramadol/metamiz
ol (50 ASA status I-IV patients). In phase II, piritramid had been app
lied to 70 ASA status I-II patients after an intermediate analysis of
phase I. In 7 % of the patients technical problems led to an early int
erruption even at the end of the study period. There were, however, no
incidents which caused vital problems for the patients. A mean postop
erative pain level of 55 visual analogue scale points (0-100 point sca
le) was achieved with tramadol/metamizol. PCA was stopped in 16 % of t
he patients due to the occurance of nausea or vomiting and in two pati
ents due to insufficient pain relief. The use of piritramid in phase I
I led to lower pain levels and no interruptions of PCA because of inef
fectivity or nausea/vomiting. The acceptance of PCA in both phases was
excellent; 83 % of the patients and 76 % of the nursing staff judged
PCA as being satisfactory; 87 % of the patients would prefer PCA in fu
ture and 52 % of the nursing staff felt that PCA was less time and wor
k consuming in comparison to conventional pain treatment. The results
of our study let us conclude that PCA is an effective method for posto
perative pain relief on surgical wards. However, high costs of the PCA
-pumps and a high rate of technical problems are still disadvantageous
. The utilization of PCA as well as the development of PCA-concepts ha
ve to be future tasks for surgeons in order to improve the patients' s
atisfaction.