DOPAMINE D-1 AND D-2 ANTAGONISTS ATTENUATE AMPHETAMINE-PRODUCED ENHANCEMENT OF RESPONDING FOR CONDITIONED REWARD IN RATS

Citation
R. Ranaldi et Rj. Beninger, DOPAMINE D-1 AND D-2 ANTAGONISTS ATTENUATE AMPHETAMINE-PRODUCED ENHANCEMENT OF RESPONDING FOR CONDITIONED REWARD IN RATS, Psychopharmacology, 113(1), 1993, pp. 110-118
Citations number
79
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,Psychiatry,"Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Journal title
Volume
113
Issue
1
Year of publication
1993
Pages
110 - 118
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
It has been suggested that the dopamine D-1 receptor may play an impor tant role in reward. The present study was undertaken to investigate t he roles of dopamine D-1 and D-2 receptor subtypes in responding for c onditioned reward. This was done by examining the effects of the D-1 a ntagonist SCH 23390 and the D-2 antagonists pimozide and metoclopramid e on amphetamine-produced enhancement of responding for conditioned re ward. The procedure consisted of three distinct phases. During the pre -exposure phase the rats were exposed to an operant chamber containing two levers. One lever produced a lights-off stimulus (3 s) and the ot her a tone stimulus (3 s). This was followed by four conditioning sess ions during which the levers were removed and the rats were exposed to pairings of the lights-off stimulus with food. This phase was followe d by two test sessions during which the levers were present and the nu mber of responses made on each was calculated as a ratio of the number of responses made during the pre-exposure phase. A group receiving th e vehicle during the test sessions showed a greater ratio of respondin g for the lights-off stimulus than the tone stimulus, indicating that the lights-off stimulus had become a conditioned reward. Amphetamine ( 0.1, 1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 mg/k,IP, 5 min prior to test) specifically enhan ced responding on the lever producing conditioned reward. SCH 23390 (5 .0 and 10.0 mu g/ kg, SC, 2 h before test) and pimozide (0.1 and 0.2 m g/kg, IP, 4 h before test) dose-dependently shifted the peak in the am phetamine dose-response function to the right, indicating an attenuati on of conditioned reward. Metoclopramide (1.0, 5.0 and 7.5 mg/kg, IP, 1 h before test) reduced the amphetamine-produced enhancement of respo nding for conditioned reward but failed to shift the amphetamine dose- response function. These results provide evidence that both D-1 and D- 2 receptor subtypes are essential in responding for conditioned reward .