Field studies were conducted in 1990 and 1991 to determine the effects
of com planting date and hairy vetch control method on the efficacy o
f fall-planted hairy vetch as a weed-suppressive cover crop for no-til
l com. Glyphosate controlled hairy vetch when applied at the early bud
growth stage (April), but hairy vetch residue provided no weed contro
l compared to the weedy check. Mowing was not an effective means of su
ppressing hairy vetch at the early bud stage. Untreated hairy vetch re
duced weed biomass 96% in 1990 and 58% in 1991 but reduced yield over
76% in April-planted com. There was no competition of untreated hairy
vetch with com when com planting was delayed until May or June (mid- o
r late-bloom growth stages of hairy vetch). Com planted in May into un
treated hairy vetch yielded similarly to com planted in a no-cover wee
d-free check.