THE EFFECT OF RECENT ADVANCES IN PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT ON THE PROGNOSIS OF DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY

Citation
Y. Yokota et al., THE EFFECT OF RECENT ADVANCES IN PHARMACOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT ON THE PROGNOSIS OF DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY, Japanese Circulation Journal, 57(11), 1993, pp. 1038-1046
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
ISSN journal
00471828
Volume
57
Issue
11
Year of publication
1993
Pages
1038 - 1046
Database
ISI
SICI code
0047-1828(1993)57:11<1038:TEORAI>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
To determine the effect of recent advances in medical management on th e survival of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), 103 patients with DCM were studied. The subjects were divided into 3 groups based upon the time of initial medical treatment at our institute: Group I, between 1976 and 1981, 20 patients; Group II, between 1982 and 1985, 2 7 patients; and Group III, between 1986 and 1991, 56 patients. The cli nical, Holter electrocardiographic and echocardiographic findings, the pharmacologic treatments used, and the clinical outcomes for the 3 gr oups of patients were compared. During the follow-up period, which ave raged 27 months, 31 deaths related to cardiac disease occurred. The 4 year survival rate was 76% in Group III, 49% in Group II and 35% in Gr oup I; the difference in survival rate between Groups I and III was si gnificant (p<0.01). At the initial evaluation, no differences were fou nd among the 3 groups in the incidences of advanced heart failure (NYH A functional class Ill or IV), atrial fibrillation or complex ventricu lar arrhythmias. Neither diastolic blood pressure nor heart rate diffe red among the 3 groups, but Group III patients were older and had sign ificantly higher systolic blood pressures than Group I patients (p<0.0 5, for both comparisons). There were no differences among the 3 groups in % fractional shortening, left ventricular end-systolic wall stress or left ventricular wall thickness, but left ventricular dimensions w ere significantly smaller in Group III than in Group I (p<0.05). Digit alis and/or diuretic agents were administered to all of the patients o f Groups I and II and to most of the patients of Group III. There were no differences among the 3 groups in the number of patients who recei ved antiarrhythmics or anticoagulants, but vasodilators and beta-block ers were used more frequently in Group III than in Groups I and II (p< 0.01 for each comparison). In conclusion, the prognosis of DCM has imp roved, and various factors, including recent advances in pharmacologic treatments, have contributed to the prolongation of life for patients with DCM.