Although excellence in the clinical care of patients is the cornerston
e of medicine, academic health sciences centers have increasingly give
n more weight to research and correspondingly less emphasis to patient
care. To better recognize and reward clinical excellence, it is first
necessary to effectively evaluate physicians' performances in patient
care. In addition to addressing the value of faculty clinical excelle
nce in the academic setting, the authors discuss different approaches
to clinical assessment, theoretical and practical problems in assessin
g the performances of clinical faculty, and a system of evaluation bei
ng initiated at the University of Virginia School of Medicine. This sy
stem of evaluation combines-in annual individual reviews-a limited amo
unt of objective assessment data with subjective evaluations from seve
ral sources. The objective data include board certification and recert
ification, analysis of outcomes data, and documentation of scholarly a
ctivity. The subjective evaluations include letters of recognition and
appreciation from faculty colleagues and written observations from de
partment chairs, housestaff, students, and nurses. The system has been
accepted by department chairs, members of the Promotion and Tenure Co
mmittee, and the general faculty. In implementing this new system, per
iodic review of the pace and direction of change will be crucial to tr
ack progress and provide feedback for further modification.