A number of diverse methods are available for the design of geosynthet
ic-reinforced soil walls. The various methods yield widely varying res
ults. This study involved reviewing six published design methods, comp
aring design concepts; comparing the results of designs for various wa
ll heights and geometries using each of the methods, and comparing two
case histories of test walls which were tested to failure with the re
sults predicted by each of the methods. It was found that the differen
ces in the design results stem primarily from a significant disparity
in defining allowable reinforcement strength and safety factors, and t
o a lesser degree, from discrepancies among the methods of analysis.