HOW RELIABLE IS THE DIAGNOSIS OF LUNG-CANCER USING SMALL BIOPSY SPECIMENS - REPORT OF A UKCCCR-LUNG-CANCER-WORKING-PARTY

Citation
Jsj. Thomas et al., HOW RELIABLE IS THE DIAGNOSIS OF LUNG-CANCER USING SMALL BIOPSY SPECIMENS - REPORT OF A UKCCCR-LUNG-CANCER-WORKING-PARTY, Thorax, 48(11), 1993, pp. 1135-1139
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Respiratory System
Journal title
ThoraxACNP
ISSN journal
00406376
Volume
48
Issue
11
Year of publication
1993
Pages
1135 - 1139
Database
ISI
SICI code
0040-6376(1993)48:11<1135:HRITDO>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Background-A study was undertaken to investigate the accuracy of typin g of a series of bronchial carcinomas by experienced pathologists with an interest in lung cancer from the examination of bronchoscopic biop sy specimens. Methods-Eighty bronchial biopsy specimens showing positi ve results for bronchial carcinoma were circulated to five pathologist s, who recorded diagnostic criteria and diagnosis for each. Diagnoses were then compared with the diagnosis agreed from the resection specim en corresponding to each biopsy specimen. A ''non-small cell carcinoma , not further specified'' classification group was introduced for smal l biopsy specimens. Results-A diagnostic accuracy of 75% was achieved for squamous cell carcinomas, 66% for small cell carcinomas, and 50% f or adenocarcinomas. There was diagnostic confusion between small cell and non-small cell carcinoma in less than 10% of cases. The introducti on of a non-specific non-small cell classification improved diagnostic accuracy by 10-15% for each non-small cell tumour group. Conclusions- There are appreciable inaccuracies in applying the World Health Organi sation's 1981 classification of lung cancer to the diagnosis of bronch ial carcinoma from small biopsy specimens and these inaccuracies have been measured. They can be diminished by introducing a less specific ' 'non-small cell'' category for use with this sort of biopsy material. Care should be taken not to overinterpret small biopsy specimens in lu ng cancer.