Km. Anson et al., TEMPORARY PROSTATIC STENTING AND ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION - A NEW MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH TO MALIGNANT PROSTATIC RETENTION, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 86(11), 1993, pp. 634-636
Urinary retention secondary to carcinoma of the prostate is usually tr
eated by 'channel' transurethral resection of the prostate either perf
ormed alone or in combination with hormone manipulation. The combinati
on of temporary prostatic stenting and androgen suppression may reduce
the morbidity and mortality associated with this treatment. We report
on our initial experience using the combination of a temporary prosta
tic stent with the oral anti-androgen Flutamide in 10 patients with ur
inary retention or severe bladder outflow obstruction secondary to pro
static carcinoma. Eight of the ten patients successfully voided and ma
intained normal voiding after stent removal. There were two treatment
failures requiring prostatic resection. We believe the cost of stentin
g and medication is entirely justified by patient preference and clear
ance of hospital beds.