A COMPARISON OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS AND OBSTETRICIANS INTRAPARTUM MANAGEMENT OF LOW-RISK PREGNANCIES

Citation
Se. Macdonald et al., A COMPARISON OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS AND OBSTETRICIANS INTRAPARTUM MANAGEMENT OF LOW-RISK PREGNANCIES, Journal of family practice, 37(5), 1993, pp. 457-462
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
ISSN journal
00943509
Volume
37
Issue
5
Year of publication
1993
Pages
457 - 462
Database
ISI
SICI code
0094-3509(1993)37:5<457:ACOFPA>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Background. We hypothesized that family physicians' style of intrapart um management was less interventional than the management style of obs tetricians, and that this would not adversely affect maternal or neona tal outcomes. Methods. A retrospective, matched-pair study design was used to compare low-risk women cared for by community family physician s with those cared for by obstetricians at a small teaching hospital. The subjects were matched on the basis of age and parity. We compared the rates of intervention between family physicians and obstetricians. Results. We studied 351 matched pairs of women. The demographic chara cteristics of patients were similar as were the rates for most labor a nd delivery procedures. Family physicians had lower rates for inductio n, external and internal fetal monitoring, narcotic analgesia use, and postpartum oxytocin use. Women cared for by family physicians spent l ess time in the hospital, both during labor and postpartum. Conclusion . This study supports the hypothesis that at our center family physici ans intervene less than obstetricians in intrapartum management. Compa risons with similar studies conducted at other academic centers illust rate differences in styles of practice between institutions, not just between specialties.