Ack. Soong et al., SYSTEMATIC COMPARISONS OF INTERPOLATION TECHNIQUES IN TOPOGRAPHIC BRAIN MAPPING, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 87(4), 1993, pp. 185-195
The performance of one local interpolation technique, the nearest neig
hbors, and two global spline techniques, one planar and the other sphe
rical, commonly used for topographic mapping of brain potential data h
as been quantitatively evaluated. The method of evaluation was one of
cross-validation where the potential at each site in a 31-electrode fu
ll scalp recording montage is predicted by interpolation from the othe
r sites. Errors between the measured potentials and those predicted by
interpolation were quantified using 4 measures defined as inaccuracy,
precision, bias and tolerance. The evaluation was applied to the back
ground EEGs from 5 normal volunteers and from 4 patients with epilepsy
, tumor or stroke. The results indicate that none of the interpolation
techniques performed well and that for localized components in the EE
G, the errors can increase almost without limit. Further, the global t
echniques performed significantly better than the local technique with
2 being the best order for the nearest-neighbor technique and 3 for t
he spline techniques. It is concluded that interpolation should not be
used with electrode densities of the order of that provided by the in
ternational 10-20 system neither to increase the spatial resolution of
the electroencephalogram nor in more sophisticated analysis technique
s in quantitative EEG for estimates such as the radial-current density
.