A currently unresolved issue in stimulus equivalence research is the r
elation of equivalence and language competence. The current consensus
is that equivalence according to widely adopted criteria proposed by S
idman has not yet been demonstrated in nonverbal experimental subjects
. This judgment rests primarily on the failure of nonhuman subjects to
display the equivalence outcome under conditions comparable to those
used with human subjects. We discuss theoretical and methodological is
sues that arise in research seeking to delineate the ''lower limits''
of equivalence phenomena in studies with laboratory animals or nonverb
al humans. We propose a behavior-analytic approach to the question, ex
amine the relationship between functional stimulus classes and equival
ence classes, and describe some preliminary studies.