Tm. Wragge et Be. Cooper, CORRELATION OF AMINOGLYCOSIDE AND VANCOMYCIN PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS, The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 27(11), 1993, pp. 1346-1348
OBJECTIVE: To investigate a correlation between the elimination rate c
onstants (K(e)) of aminoglycosides (AG) and vancomycin; to investigate
the correlation between actual K(e) and creatinine clearance (Cl(cr))
for AG versus vancomycin; to investigate the calculated versus actual
K(e) for AG and vancomycin; and to investigate a correlation between
volumes of distribution (V(d)) between AG and vancomycin. DESIGN: Retr
ospective data collection. METHODs: Patients in our institution who re
ceived AGs or vancomycin concomitantly or within six weeks of each oth
er were identified retrospectively. Patient subpopulations were identi
fied and analyzed collectively as well as individually. Steady-state s
erum concentrations of AG and vancomycin (more than four half-lives) w
ere obtained and kinetic parameters (K(e), V(d)) were calculated using
first-order pharmacokinetic equations. Linear regression was used to
determine correlation coefficients. RESULTS: In the total population a
nd all subpopulations, the correlation between K(e) of AG and vancomyc
in was superior to the correlation between K(e) and Cl(cr)). The corre
lations (r2) between K(e) for AG and vancomycin in the total, general
medicine, oncology, and intensive care units (ICU) populations were 0.
572, 0.878, 0.349, and 0.561, respectively. The correlations (r2) betw
een K(e) and Cl(cr) for AG in the total, general medicine, oncology, a
nd ICU populations were 0.235, 0.430, 0.005, and 0.238, respectively.
The correlations (r2) between K(e) and Cl(cr), for vancomycin in the t
otal, general medicine, oncology, and ICU populations were 0.300, 0.40
7, 0.055, and 0.309, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The correlation betwee
n K(e) of AG and vancomycin may be beneficial for predicting K(e) of v
ancomycin when AG concentrations have already been obtained or vice ve
rsa, and may give more accurate estimations of dosing intervals and re
quire less time adjusting, ordering, and interpreting concentrations a
nd dosages.