REGULATION OF SERUM INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR-I (IGF-I), HEPATIC GROWTH-HORMONE BINDING AND IGF-I GENE-EXPRESSION IN THE RAT DURING PREGNANCY AND LACTATION
Mt. Travers et al., REGULATION OF SERUM INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTOR-I (IGF-I), HEPATIC GROWTH-HORMONE BINDING AND IGF-I GENE-EXPRESSION IN THE RAT DURING PREGNANCY AND LACTATION, Journal of Endocrinology, 139(1), 1993, pp. 89-95
An apparent GH resistance occurs in pregnancy, since GH concentrations
in serum are reported to be normal or elevated, whereas serum IGF-I f
alls to very low levels. To determine whether this GH resistance is ma
nifest at the level of the hepatic GH receptor or in the ability of GH
to initiate IGF-I gene expression, we have determined hepatic IGF-I m
RNA expression, circulating IGF-I and hepatic GH binding during variou
s stages of pregnancy and lactation in the rat. The concentration of I
GF-I in serum fell from 37 +/- 5 nmol/l (means +/- S.E.M.) in virgin r
ats to 17 +/- 1 nmol/l in rats in late pregnancy, recovered in early l
actation (31 +/- 3 nmol/l) but was again significantly lower than in v
irgin animals by mid-lactation (22 +/- 3 nmol/l). Hepatic GH binding d
id not vary significantly during pregnancy but showed a small signific
ant decrease in early lactation when expressed per mg membrane protein
. When expressed as GH binding per liver, however, there were no signi
ficant changes in GH binding at any stage. Liver weight increased sign
ificantly between virgin and early pregnant animals (7.1 +/- 0.2 g com
pared with 9.2 +/- 0.5 g respectively, P<0.01) and continued to increa
se up to late lactation (14.3 +/- 0.4 g). Similarly, although the amou
nt of IGF-I gene expression/unit RNA declined in late pregnant when co
mpared with virgin animals (6.0 +/- 0.6 versus 3.4 +/- 0.4 arbitrary o
ptical density units respectively, P<0.05), when the increase in liver
weight and RNA content during pregnancy was taken into account there
was actually a steady increase in IGF-I gene expression per total live
r throughout both pregnancy and lactation, the difference becoming sig
nificant by mid-lactation (P<0.05). Thus, when the changes in liver we
ight which take place during pregnancy and lactation are taken into ac
count we conclude that any hepatic resistance to GH in late pregnancy
and lactation must be a post-receptor event which is mitigated in larg
e part by increase in liver size, cell number and RNA content.