Ds. Hibbett et al., SPOROCARP ONTOGENY IN PANUS (BASIDIOMYCOTINA) - EVOLUTION AND CLASSIFICATION, American journal of botany, 80(11), 1993, pp. 1336-1348
Ontogenies of cultured Panus conchatus, P. rudis, and P. fulvus sporoc
arps were observed macroscopically and with scanning electron microsco
py. Hymenophore differentiation in Panus involves periclinal growth of
context hyphae below a closed surface palisade of hymenial elements,
resulting in a cantharelloid appearance and radiate trama. This patter
n is qualitatively different from that in Lentinus s. str., which sugg
ests that lamellae of Panus and Lentinus are not homologous. Panus con
chatus and P. rudis sporocarps have short stipes, develop directly fro
m the mycelium, and mature in 5-10 d. Panus fulvus sporocarps have an
elongate stipe, develop from a pseudosclerotium, and mature in about 3
wk, the first approximately 15 d of which involve apical elongation o
f a stipelike primordium that is able to dedifferentiate and regenerat
e cut apices. Panus conchatus and P. rudis sporocarps lacked regenerat
ion ability. Panus conchatus sporocarps developed an ephemeral partial
veil that was obliterated during sporocarp expansion. Outgroup compar
ison suggests that evolutionary changes in developmental programs in P
anus have included: 1) delay in offset of primordium growth, with a co
rresponding increase in primordium size and time to maturation (hyperm
orphosis); 2) insertion of the pseudosclerotial stage in ontogeny; 3)
gain of ability for dedifferentiation and regeneration; and 4) nonterm
inal gain or loss of veil tissue.