Peri-operative arrhythmia is one of the major complications in anaesth
esia for valve replacement surgery in patients with aortic stenosis. I
n this retrospective study, 58 patients with sinus rhythm were investi
gated from induction of anaesthesia until arrival at the recovery room
by close haemodynamic monitoring and Holter ECG recording. After card
iopulmonary bypass (CPB), they received either lidocaine (L, n = 35) o
r mexiletine (M, n = 23) via infusion for 24 hours. Pre-bypass inciden
ce was 14% for supraventricular (SPBs) and 19% for ventricular serious
arrhythmia (VPBs), i.e. high-grade forms which indicate possible dete
rioration and may require therapy (for all arrhythmia, incidences were
45 resp. 28%). VPBs was independently related to impaired left ventri
cular function (II patients) and preoperative digitalis therapy (20 pa
tients) but not to severity of stenosis, serum concentration of potass
ium (between 3.3 and 5.2 meq/1), or any other clinical parameters. Pos
t-bypass incidence was SPBs 11% and VPBs 33%, the latter representing
a significant increase compared to the first period (p<0.03)-(all arrh
ythmia: 26 resp. 40%). VPBs was related to the need for multiple thera
py including catecholamines and antiarrhythmic agents other than L or
M, but no longer to preoperative parameters nor duration of intraopera
tive ischaemia. Incidences of arrhythmia for L and M were identical. W
hile in these patients digitalis therapy may account for arrhythmia al
so in general anaesthesia, in valve replacement there is a post-bypass
increase in VPBs which is not fully explained. Since the incidence is
33% in spite of anti-arrhythmic therapy, both administered class IB d
rugs may not be the best therapeutic approach.