A COMPARISON OF NONTHREADED, ENHANCED THREADED, AND ELLIS FIXATION PINS USED IN TYPE-I EXTERNAL SKELETAL FIXATORS IN DOGS

Citation
Ma. Anderson et al., A COMPARISON OF NONTHREADED, ENHANCED THREADED, AND ELLIS FIXATION PINS USED IN TYPE-I EXTERNAL SKELETAL FIXATORS IN DOGS, Veterinary surgery, 22(6), 1993, pp. 482-489
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
01613499
Volume
22
Issue
6
Year of publication
1993
Pages
482 - 489
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-3499(1993)22:6<482:ACONET>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Three different pin types (Ellis, enhanced threaded, and nonthreaded) were used in type 1 external skeletal fixation after transverse osteot omy of the radius and ulna in 12 skeletally mature dogs. Dogs were pla ced into three groups of four dogs based on the pin type used. Axial e xtraction forces were determined for each of the pin types after 8 wee ks of weight bearing (chronic study). Nine contralateral radii were us ed to determine axial extraction forces for nine of each pin type not subjected to weight bearing forces (acute study). The force required f or extraction of the enhanced threaded and Ellis pins in the chronic a nd acute studies was not significantly different. The force required t o extract the nonthreaded pins was significantly less than that requir ed for the other two pin types. Ground reaction forces had returned to levels measured before surgery by 2 weeks after surgery in the enhanc ed threaded and Ellis pin groups, however, dogs in the nonthreaded pin group required 4 weeks until normal ground reaction forces were measu red. Radiographic evaluations 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after surgery sh owed no difference among groups in the number of pin tract radiolucenc ies, however, the enhanced threaded pins had caused more trans-cortica l chip fractures than the other two pin types. None of the pins broke during the eight-week chronic study.