Sd. Fox et Lw. Henderson, CARDIOVASCULAR-RESPONSE DURING HEMODIALYSIS AND HEMOFILTRATION - THERMAL, MEMBRANE, AND CATECHOLAMINE INFLUENCES, Blood purification, 11(4), 1993, pp. 224-236
Nine patients on regular dialysis were studied, in a cross-over format
comparing hemodialysis (HD) and hemofiltration (HF), to identify pote
ntial mechanisms of the disparate hemodynamic responses. Dialysis and
substitution fluid composition (high sodium, acetate), treatment time,
fluid loss rate, and membrane type (AN 69) were matched. Cardiac outp
ut was determined by changes in thoracic electrical bioimpedance. Card
iac output remained stable during HF but increased during HD (p < 0.00
1, HD vs. HF), despite a parallel reduction in stroke volume. The hear
t rate response was significantly greater during HD relative to HF (p
< 0.01). Systemic vascular resistance remained stable during HF but de
creased significantly during HD (p < 0.05). Although there was a modes
t fall during HD, the difference in blood pressure at the end of treat
ment between HD and HF was not significant. Comparable increases in bo
dy temperature were observed during both treatments. Plasma catecholam
ines increased in parallel during HD and HF and following orthostatic
stimulation at the end of treatment, and extracorporeal catecholamine
clearances were similar. The values for serum sodium, total CO2, anion
gap, potassium, and hematocrit at the end of treatment were similar,
whereas total serum calcium was significantly greater following HD. Th
ere were no significant differences in indices of myocardial contracti
lity or central blood volume. These results suggest that the disparate
hemodynamic responses to fluid and solute removal during HD and HF ca
n be dissociated from changes in osmolality or venous tone, membrane b
ioincompatibility, thermal stress, or differences in acetate delivery
or catecholamine release. The explanation for the disparate hemodynami
c responses between these two treatment modalities remains unclear. A
role for an as yet unidentified vasodilatory substance generated durin
g dialysate exposure, or convectively removed during hemofiltration, r
emain intriguing possibilities.