VASCULAR INJURY IN ANTERIOR LUMBAR SURGERY

Citation
Jk. Baker et al., VASCULAR INJURY IN ANTERIOR LUMBAR SURGERY, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 18(15), 1993, pp. 2227-2230
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Orthopedics
ISSN journal
03622436
Volume
18
Issue
15
Year of publication
1993
Pages
2227 - 2230
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-2436(1993)18:15<2227:VIIALS>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Anterior approaches to the lumbar spine are rapidly gaining popularity for decompressive and reconstructive procedures. A recognized hazard to this approach to the spine is possible injury to the great vessels. This retrospective study is a review of 102 consecutive anterior lumb ar spinal procedures. All approaches were performed by one of two fell owship-trained vascular surgeons. Both have extensive experience with this approach. All injuries to the inferior vena cava, common iliac ve in, or other great vessels that required suture repair were recorded. The authors were surprised to note an overall rate for this vascular c omplication of 15.6%. These injuries included 11 tears of the common i liac vein, four tears of the inferior vena cava, and one avulsion of t he iliolumbar vein. Two different approaches were used during this stu dy. Twenty-six cases were performed through a flank incision, with the dissection proceeding through the external and internal oblique muscl es as well as the transversus abdominis. The average number of levels exposed was 2.3. Two vascular complications resulted, for an incidence of 7.7%. Seventy-six procedures were carried out through a small (5-1 0 cm) incision overlying the rectus abdominis muscle. The retroperiton eal space was entered through the posterior rectus sheath without divi sion of any muscle tissue. This resulted in 14 vascular complications, for an incidence of 18.4%. Although the authors are unaware of any ma jor long-term morbidity from this complication in their patient group, they believe feel that the true incidence of this potentially quite s erious complication may be underestimated. Their experience further su ggests that the ''small incision'' exposure through the rectus abdomin is sheath may significantly increase the incidence of vascular injury.