NEGATIVE REPEAT TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE FAILS TO IDENTIFYPATIENTS WITH STAGE-A1 PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA AT LOWER RISK OF PROGRESSION - A LONG-TERM STUDY
A. Ingerman et al., NEGATIVE REPEAT TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE FAILS TO IDENTIFYPATIENTS WITH STAGE-A1 PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA AT LOWER RISK OF PROGRESSION - A LONG-TERM STUDY, Urology, 42(5), 1993, pp. 528-531
Stage Al (low-grade and low-volume) adenocarcinoma is associated with
a low likelihood of progression. Repeat transurethral resection has be
en used to identify patients at increased risk (residual cancer noted)
as well as those at low risk of progression (no residual cancer noted
). We recently evaluated the ability of this technique to define a low
-risk patient population. We reviewed the records of 24 patients who u
nderwent repeat transurethral resection after they were identified as
having Stage Al prostatic cancer on initial resection (Gleason score <
5, tumor volume comprising < 5% of the resection specimen). Despite n
o evidence of residual carcinoma on repeat resection, 3 patients (13%)
progressed at a mean follow-up of seven years (2 locally, 1 locally a
nd distantly). We conclude that repeat resection does not effectively
evaluate the risk of progression and that other techniques including t
ransrectal ultrasonography and serial prostate-specific antigen measur
ements should be similarly evaluated.