ACHALASIA - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER PRESSURE, ESOPHAGEAL TRANSIT, AND ESOPHAGEAL DIAMETERAND SYMPTOMS IN RESPONSE TO PNEUMATIC DILATION
Ch. Kim et al., ACHALASIA - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER PRESSURE, ESOPHAGEAL TRANSIT, AND ESOPHAGEAL DIAMETERAND SYMPTOMS IN RESPONSE TO PNEUMATIC DILATION, Mayo Clinic proceedings, 68(11), 1993, pp. 1067-1073
The aims of this study were to investigate a group of patients with ac
halasia prospectively to determine (1) the relationship between change
s in symptoms and esophageal motor function in response to pneumatic d
ilation and (2) the effects of the balloon size as well as the frequen
cy and duration of inflation on the outcome of treatment. Fourteen pat
ients with achalasia who were symptomatic for a median duration of 27
months participated in the study. The patients were randomized to one
combination of the following pneumatic dilation conditions: a 30- or 3
5-mm balloon dilator, one or two balloon inflations, and 20,40, or 60
seconds per balloon inflation. A comprehensive assessment of their sym
ptoms and esophageal motility, transit, and diameter was performed bef
ore and 3 months after pneumatic dilation. Pneumatic dilation provided
significant relief of dysphagia (P<0.01), but other symptoms (heartbu
rn, regurgitation, and chest pain) remained unchanged. Pneumatic dilat
ion also caused a significant decrease in lower esophageal sphincter p
ressure and esophageal diameter and improved esophageal emptying of a
solid bolus. Nevertheless, no significant association was detected bet
ween changes in the symptom score for dysphagia and changes in objecti
ve response measures as a result of pneumatic dilation. Changes in the
symptom score for dysphagia or objective responses were similar regar
dless of the size of the dilator used or the frequency and duration of
the balloon inflations. We conclude that no one particular objective
determination of esophageal motor function is a reliable predictor of
the symptomatic response to pneumatic dilation and that the symptomati
c response does not depend on the size of the dilator, the frequency o
f balloon inflations, or the duration of inflation.