R. Schapers et al., HETEROGENEITY IN BLADDER-CANCER AS DETECTED BY CONVENTIONAL CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS AND INTERPHASE CYTOGENETICS, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics, 70(1), 1993, pp. 56-61
Thirty transitional cell carcinomas (TCCs) of the bladder were examine
d by classical chromosome counting to establish range, modal number, a
nd percentage of metaphases with 2n, 3n, 4n, and greater-than-or-equal
-to 5n chromosomes. In addition, fluorescence in situ hybridization (F
ISH) was applied to interphase nuclei to detect the percentage of tumo
r cells showing polyploidization and chromosome imbalance. In FISH, ce
ntromere-specific DNA probes for chromosomes 1, 7, 9, and 11 were used
. The tumors were analyzed flow cytometrically to determine the DNA in
dex (DI). Fourteen of 21 cases (67%) having a DI = 1 showed, after cla
ssical chromosome counting, in addition to a diploid model number, som
e cells with a 3n and 4n chromosome count. With FISH, eight cases (38%
) showed a low percentage of cells with multiple signals for each of t
he probes, thus indicating polyploidization. In 13 (62%) cases, an imb
alance between different chromosomes was detected. In nine tumors havi
ng a DI of 1.6 to 1.9, classical chromosome counting showed low percen
tages of greater-than-or-equal-to 5n cells in four cases, in addition
to a triploid modal number. With FISH in six cases, a low percentage o
f cells showed five or more signals for each of the chromosomes, indic
ating polyploidization. In all cases, a chromosome imbalance was detec
ted. With classical chromosome counting not all tumors can be analyzed
. With FISH, small percentages of polyploid cells are not recognized.
Both methods complement each other in that chromosome counting allows
readier detection of heterogeneity in DNA-diploid tumors after polyplo
idization, whereas FISH allows efficient recognition of the chromosome
s involved in the process of imbalance.