PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF RISK-FACTORS IN NATURAL-RUBBER LATEX HYPERSENSITIVITY

Citation
Da. Moneretvautrin et al., PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF RISK-FACTORS IN NATURAL-RUBBER LATEX HYPERSENSITIVITY, Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 92(5), 1993, pp. 668-677
Citations number
54
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology,Allergy
ISSN journal
00916749
Volume
92
Issue
5
Year of publication
1993
Pages
668 - 677
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-6749(1993)92:5<668:PORINL>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Five hundred sixty-nine subjects routinely underwent skin prick tests for latent sensitization to latex The study of risk factors included s kin tests to inhalant allergens to diagnose atopy, and a questionnaire aimed at revealing frequent exposure to latex such as the wearing of gloves, multiple surgical procedures, or urinary catheterization. The subjects were categorized into five groups. group I, subjects with no risk factor (n = 272); group II, nonatopic subjects exposed to later ( n = 73); group III, atopic subjects not exposed (n = 180); group IV, e xposed atopic subjects (n = 44); and group V, subjects with a history of intraoperative anaphylactic shock caused by latex (n = 13). Twenty- five subjects had spina bifida and were in either group II (14 subject s) or group IV (11 subjects). The questionnaire identified a probable allergy to latex in 18 subjects: 16 cases were confirmed by skin test, but responses were not informative in 23 patients who were sensitive to latex. Positive prick tests to latex were obtained in 0.37% of grou p I, 6.85% of group II, 9.44% of group III, and 36.36% of group IV. Of the children with spina bifida, 32 % had positive skin test results. As risk factors, atopy and exposure were synergistic. We recommend pre dictive prick tests not only in children with spina but also in any at opic subject or in any patient with a history of frequent exposure to latex. Latex could be considered a habitual allergen. The use of latex urinary catheters should be avoided in patients who are catheterized on a daily basis.