Da. Moneretvautrin et al., PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF RISK-FACTORS IN NATURAL-RUBBER LATEX HYPERSENSITIVITY, Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 92(5), 1993, pp. 668-677
Five hundred sixty-nine subjects routinely underwent skin prick tests
for latent sensitization to latex The study of risk factors included s
kin tests to inhalant allergens to diagnose atopy, and a questionnaire
aimed at revealing frequent exposure to latex such as the wearing of
gloves, multiple surgical procedures, or urinary catheterization. The
subjects were categorized into five groups. group I, subjects with no
risk factor (n = 272); group II, nonatopic subjects exposed to later (
n = 73); group III, atopic subjects not exposed (n = 180); group IV, e
xposed atopic subjects (n = 44); and group V, subjects with a history
of intraoperative anaphylactic shock caused by latex (n = 13). Twenty-
five subjects had spina bifida and were in either group II (14 subject
s) or group IV (11 subjects). The questionnaire identified a probable
allergy to latex in 18 subjects: 16 cases were confirmed by skin test,
but responses were not informative in 23 patients who were sensitive
to latex. Positive prick tests to latex were obtained in 0.37% of grou
p I, 6.85% of group II, 9.44% of group III, and 36.36% of group IV. Of
the children with spina bifida, 32 % had positive skin test results.
As risk factors, atopy and exposure were synergistic. We recommend pre
dictive prick tests not only in children with spina but also in any at
opic subject or in any patient with a history of frequent exposure to
latex. Latex could be considered a habitual allergen. The use of latex
urinary catheters should be avoided in patients who are catheterized
on a daily basis.