Objective: The aim was to examine whether diabetes interferes with the
development of myocardial injury in a canine ischaemia-reperfusion mo
del. Methods: Non-insulin-requiring diabetes was induced in dogs by th
e streptozotocin-alloxan method. After 75 d, the dogs were anaesthetis
ed and myocardial infarction was provoked by occluding the left anteri
or descending coronary artery for 2 h followed by 6 h reperfusion. Res
ults: Diabetic dogs had higher blood glucose [9.4(SEM 1) mmol.litre-1]
, fructosamine [417(57) mumol.litre-1], and glycated haemoglobin [3.3(
0.7)%], than control dogs [5.5(0.6), p = 0.04, 243(15), p = 0.01, and
0.7(0.2), p = 0.003, respectively], and they also had higher serum lip
ids (p = 0.00 1) and platelet aggregation (p = 0.03). Area at risk was
similar in diabetic and control dogs but in contrast to controls (r =
0.78, p = 0.007), area at risk and infarct size were not correlated i
n diabetics (r = 0.08). In both groups, collateral flow was the major
determinant of infarct size: r = A.73 in controls (p = 0.02) and -0.97
in diabetics (p = 0.00 1). In spite of higher subendocardial collater
al flow in diabetics [representing 21.6(6)% of the flow in the corresp
onding non-ischaemic zone] than in controls [11.2(6)%], infarct size w
as similar in both groups. However, the mean observed infarct size in
the diabetic group [7.5(2.8)% of the left ventricle] was significantly
(p < 0.03) larger than the mean predicted infarct size [5.2(2)%]. Mul
tivariate analysis confirmed that diabetes, as well as collateral flow
, is an independent (p = 0.03) predictor of infarct size. Conclusions:
For a given collateral flow, diabetic dogs develop larger infarcts th
an controls. Further studies are required to investigate the biochemic
al mechanism(s) underlying this deleterious effect. However, this may
partly explain the poor prognosis of myocardial infarction in diabetic