Simple evolutionary processes can regularly generate events that appea
r highly unlikely when compared to the universe of all possible events
. Models incorporating this evolutionary dynamic we call ''constructio
nist'' and we contrast them with traditional models which focus on sta
tic, equilibrium aspects. In population genetics, constructionist mode
ls have provided a different perspective on several long-standing prob
lems. We review three examples of the results from our own work. These
results are: (1) simple evolutionary processes can result in multiple
-allele polymorphisms maintained by selection that are highly unlikely
to occur if fitnesses are chosen simultaneously and at random; (2) th
e frequency at which viabilities (e.g., heterozygote advantage or rece
ssive lethality) occur in mutations is likely to be very different fro
m that observed in established polymorphisms; and (3) the power of the
Ewens-Watterson test of neutrality is low. Several extensions of the
models are discussed, together with the sorts of questions they may an
swer. We conclude that a complete understanding of the evolutionary fo
rces responsible for molecular polymorphism requires consideration of
its temporal development as well as examination of its current form.