Em. Zeman et al., THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROLIFERATIVE AND OXYGENATION STATUS IN SPONTANEOUS CANINE TUMORS, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 27(4), 1993, pp. 891-898
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: Immunocytochemical markers have been applied to biopsy specim
ens from spontaneous canine tumors to assess the prevalence and spatia
l distribution of proliferating and hypoxic cells, and their ''geograp
hic'' relationship to each other. Both types of cells have been implic
ated in the failure to locally control human tumors treated with radia
tion and chemotherapy. Methods and Materials: For the detection of hyp
oxic cells, a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against a protein-boun
d, hexafluorinated, 2-nitroimidazole, designated CCI-103F, was used. T
he unmetabolized drug must first be injected into the dog to allow tim
e for hypoxic metabolism and cellular binding to occur. For the detect
ion of proliferating cells, a mouse monoclonal antibody raised against
an endogenous nuclear protein, the ''proliferating cell nuclear antig
en,'' or PCNA, was used. This protein is expressed in most actively pr
oliferating cells, but not in quiescent ones. An indirect immunostaini
ng technique was used to visualize these markers in the tissue section
s, and image analysis was used to estimate the area fraction of positi
ve staining in representative, low magnification microscope fields. Re
sults: Tumors with both high and low hypoxic and proliferative area fr
actions have been identified. No systematic relationship between the p
revalence of the two markers, nor of the relationship between tumor gr
ade and proliferative fraction, could be established. Staining with th
e proliferation marker was more commonly found near blood vessels, but
some ''nests'' of tumor cells apparently distant from vasculature con
tained many proliferating cells. Staining with the hypoxia marker tend
ed to be distant from the vasculature and/or bordering regions of tumo
r necrosis, but some labeled cells appeared near blood vessels, and in
the absence of necrosis. Staining of sequential sections, one with th
e proliferation marker and one with the hypoxia marker, indicated that
the two cell populations overlapped to varying extents. Some incident
al staining of canine normal tissues with both the proliferative and h
ypoxia markers was observed as well. Conclusion: The immunochemical ma
rker approach promises to be a useful tool to increase both our basic
understanding of tumor physiology and the complex nature of tumor hete
rogeneity.