Fm. Uckun et al., RADIATION-RESISTANCE OF PRIMARY CLONOGENIC BLASTS FROM CHILDREN WITH ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC-LEUKEMIA, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 27(4), 1993, pp. 899-906
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: Detailed comparative analyses of the radiation sensitivity of
primary clonogenic blasts from children with acute lymphoblastic leuk
emia (ALL) were performed to achieve a better understanding of clinica
l radiation resistance in ALL. Methods and Materials: The radiation se
nsitivity of primary clonogenic blasts from 74 children with newly dia
gnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) was analyzed using leukemic
progenitor cell (LPC) assays. Primary bone marrow blasts from all 74 p
atients were exposed to ionizing radiation and subsequently assayed fo
r LPC-derived blast colony formation. Radiation survival curves of pri
mary clonogenic blasts (i.e., LPC) were constructed for each of the ne
wly diagnosed patients using computer programs for the single-hit mult
itarget as well as the linear quadratic models of cell survival. Resul
ts: A marked interpatient variation in intrinsic radiation sensitivity
was observed between LPC populations. The SF2 values ranged from 0.01
to 1.00 (median: 0.36; mean +/- SE = 0.40 +/- 0.03), and the alpha va
lues ranged from 0.00 Gy(-1) to 3.27 Gy(-1) (median: 0.280 Gy(-1); mea
n +/- SE = 0.43 +/- 0.09 Gy(-1)). Patients were divided into groups ac
cording to their sex, age, WBC at diagnosis, cell cycle distribution o
f leukemic blasts, and immunophenotype. Only immunophenotype provided
a significant correlation with the intrinsic radiation sensitivity of
LPC. Patients with B-lineage ALL had higher SF2 (0.47 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.3
1 +/- 0.05, p < 0.05) and smaller a values (0.43 +/- 0.09 Gy(-1) vs. 0
.65 +/- 0.10 Gy(-1), p < 0.05) than T-lineage ALL patients, consistent
with greater intrinsic radiation resistance at the level of LPC. Nota
bly, 43% of B-lineage ALL cases, but only 27% of T-lineage ALL cases h
ad LPC with SF2 greater than or equal to 0.5. Similarly, 66% of B-line
age ALL cases, but only 37% of T-lineage ALL cases had LPC with alpha
values less than or equal to 0.4 Gy(-1). Combining the two indicators
of radiation resistance, we found that only 34% of the B-lineage ALL p
atients had none of the two parameters in the respective critical regi
ons (alpha less than or equal to 0.4 Gy(-1); SF2 greater than or equal
to 0.5), while 63% of the T-lineage patients had none (p < 0.05). In
multivariate analyses, the immunophenotypic B-lineage affiliation was
the only significant predictor of radiation resistance at the level of
LPC. Whether alone or in combination, none of the other variables exa
mined, including sex, age, WBC, in vitro plating efficiency, S-phase i
ndex, and proliferation index were significantly correlated with the r
adiation sensitivity or resistance of LPC. Conclusion: These results o
ffer unprecedented evidence for an association between composite immun
ophenotype (viz., B-lineage ALL vs T-lineage ALL) and radiation resist
ance that may form a basis for modifying radiation conditioning regime
ns.