A critique of some recent publications (concerning the so-called inver
ted region in exchange-induced electronic energy transfer) is presente
d. It is first pointed out that the phenomena reported therein have in
fact been known for nearly two decades; next, a derivation of the exp
ression (used in the aforementioned communications) for k(EnT), the tr
ansfer rate constant, is presented; finally, it is stressed that this
formula cannot provide reliable quantitative predictions.