ITERATIVE ALGEBRAIC RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHMS FOR EMISSION COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY - A UNIFIED FRAMEWORK AND ITS APPLICATION TO POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY
Xl. Xu et al., ITERATIVE ALGEBRAIC RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHMS FOR EMISSION COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY - A UNIFIED FRAMEWORK AND ITS APPLICATION TO POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY, Medical physics, 20(6), 1993, pp. 1675-1684
In this paper, a unified framework of iterative algebraic reconstructi
on for emission computed tomography (ECT) and its application to posit
ron emission tomography (PET) is presented. The unified framework is b
ased on an algebraic image restoration model and contains conventional
iterative algebraic reconstruction algorithms: ART, SIRT, Landweber i
teration (LWB), the generalized Landweber iteration (GLWB), the steepe
st descent method (STP), as well as iterative filtered backprojection
(IFBP) reconstruction algorithms: Chang's method, Walters' method, and
a modified iterative MAP. The framework provides an effective tool to
systematically study conventional iterative algebraic algorithms and
IFBP algorithms. Based on this framework, conventional iterative algeb
raic algorithms and IFBP algorithms are generalized. It is shown from
the algebraic point of view that IFBP algorithms are not only excellen
t methods for correction of attenuation (either uniform or nonuniform)
but are also good general iterative reconstruction algorithms (they c
an be applied to either attenuated or attenuation-free projections and
converge very fast). The convergence behavior of iterative algebraic
algorithms is discussed and insight is drawn into the fast convergence
proper-ty of IFBP algorithms. A simulated PET system is used to evalu
ate IFBP algorithms and LWB in comparison with the maximum likelihood
estimation via expectation maximization algorithm (MLE-EM) and the fil
tered backprojection (FBP) algorithm. The simulation results indicate
that for both attenuation-free projection and attenuated projection ca
ses IFBP algorithms have a significant computational advantage over LW
B and MLE-EM, and have performance advantages over FBP in terms of con
trast recovery and/or noise-to-signal ratios (NSRs) in regions of inte
rest.