Objective: To determine the accuracy of the Q-tip test to measure uret
hrovesical junction mobility. Methods: One hundred fourteen women with
urinary incontinence or genital prolapse were evaluated with a Q-tip
test and perineal ultrasound scanning to measure urethrovesical juncti
on mobility with strain. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive an
d negative predictive values of the Q-tip test to diagnose urethrovesi
cal junction hypermobility were calculated using ultrasound as the sta
ndard. Repeat Q-tip and ultrasound measurements were obtained in ten s
ubjects and analyzed for reproducibility. Results: The Q-tip test had
a sensitivity of 25%, specificity of 78%, positive predictive value of
67%, and negative predictive value of 37%. The Q-tip and ultrasound m
easurements were reproducible, as the within-subject variation was sig
nificantly small when compared to between-subject variation (P = .0001
). Conclusion: The Q-tip test is inaccurate for measurement of urethro
vesical junction mobility and should not be used in the manner describ
ed to diagnose urethrovesical junction hypermobility.