M. Brigell et al., IDENTIFICATION OF THE HEMISPHERE ACTIVATED BY HEMIFIELD VISUAL-STIMULATION USING A SINGLE EQUIVALENT DIPOLE MODEL, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 87(5), 1993, pp. 291-299
Topographic amplitude distribution of the hemifield pattern visual evo
ked potential (PVEP) shows substantial intersubject variability. Many
subjects have larger P100 amplitudes paradoxically over the hemisphere
ipsilateral to the stimulated field, whereas others show larger respo
nses over the stimulated hemisphere. The present study was designed to
determine whether a single equivalent dipole model could correctly id
entify the field of stimulation, and therefore the hemisphere activate
d, under conditions in which the surface distribution is variable. Und
er conditions used in the present study, visual examination of the sur
face amplitude distribution of the P100 peak could not be reliably use
d to identify the hemifield that was stimulated. Of 28 hemifield PVEPs
, obtained from 14 normal subjects, only 13 showed higher amplitude ip
silateral to the field of stimulation. Thus, neither examination of EP
wave forms nor topographic maps provided an accurate means for determ
ination of which hemifield was stimulated or which hemisphere was acti
vated. The single equivalent dipole model correctly identified the sti
mulated hemisphere for 25/28 hemifield PVEPs. Orientation of the equiv
alent dipole accounted for much of the variability in surface amplitud
e distribution, with tangential orientations obtained in subjects with
ipsilaterally predominant P100 surface topography. Although the dipol
e model improved identification of the stimulated hemisphere, dipoles
were located anterior or inferior to the occipital lobe in some subjec
ts. Results suggest that dipole modeling can provide useful informatio
n regarding the source of surface recorded potentials.