The handling characteristics of a gallium alloy (Gallium Alloy GF) wer
e compared to those of a spherical high-copper amalgam (Tytin). Ten de
ntists each restored four identical MO preparations in acrylic typodon
t teeth (no. 30), two with amalgam and two with gallium alloy. Each re
storation was evaluated immediately following completion by the operat
or for six clinically relevant criteria. Each criterion was scored bet
ween 1 and 5, where 1 = very poor, 2 = poor, 3 = fair, 4 = good, and 5
= very good. Three two-sided Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare
the median scores for significant differences (P < 0.05). The first te
st indicated no significant difference between scores for the first- a
nd second-placed restorations, within criteria and within alloy type (
n = 10). The second test indicated a significant difference between am
algam and gallium alloy, within criteria and within restoration sequen
ce (n = 10), for each criterion except resistance to fracture during r
emoval of the matrix band. The third test indicated a significant diff
erence between amalgam and gallium alloy, within each criteria, combin
ing scores for first- and second-placed restorations (n = 20). During
simulated clinical placement amalgam was rated significantly higher th
an gallium alloy in each handling characteristic evaluated.