Accurate laboratory monitoring of oral anticoagulation has been emphas
ized as an important factor in providing safe and effective therapy fo
r patients with thromboembolism. However, recent reports indicate that
coagulation laboratories may not be providing optimal clinical inform
ation to clinicians who treat these patients. We surveyed all hospital
coagulation laboratories in Utah to determine their format for report
ing prothrombin time results in patients receiving oral anticoagulants
. We found that less than 50% of laboratories used the reliable report
ing format, i.e., the Interational Normalized Ratio (INR), and that ma
ny of the laboratories using the INR format may be reporting incorrect
values. Our survey also found a significant lack of interest by physi
cians in requesting that their laboratories adopt reliable reporting m
ethods. These results indicate a substantial lack of understanding by
laboratories and clinicians of the importance of using reliable method
s to monitor oral anticoagulation. Significant educational efforts wil
l be required to correct this problem. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.