In the post-World War II era, American women have been consistently le
ss militaristic and more opposed to war than American men. Theorists,
both feminist and not, have attributed such differences to gender itse
lf, maternalism, and feminism. Drawing on the American National Electi
on Study 1991 Pilot Study, we explore these hypotheses and discover no
support for the maternalist explanation, some evidence in favor of th
e feminist accounting, and substantial support for the gender explanat
ion. We also probe into the structure of political thinking in these a
reas and discover that the roots of women's and men's thinking usually
differ even when they basically agree on the ''bottom line.'' In part
icular, men's attitudes are much more partisan in their origins than a
re women's.