Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the main causes of infectiou
s morbidity and mortality in renal transplant (RT). The efficacy of an
tiviral drugs in highly related their early implementation, so that th
e availity of rapid diagnostic methods is important With the aim of de
termining which are the most useful, we conducted a prospective study
to compare several of these tests. From feb/87 to july/92, 174 renal t
ransplants were prospectively studied for cytomegalovirus disease (CMV
D) to infection (CMM). 23 patients who lost their grafts during the fi
rst 3 post-transplant months were excluded of the analysis, remaining
151 patients for study (107 men and 44 woman, age 43 +/- 12, 12-68 yea
rs). The virological protocol consisted in collecting peripheral blood
leukocytes, urine and serum samples weekly during the first two post-
transplant months and then in each clinical revision during the first
year. Virological studies included conventional and shell-vial culture
s in blood and urine, indirect immunofluorescence with monoclonal anti
bodies in buffy coat(antigenemia), and detection of IgG and IgM antibo
dies (FC and EIA assays). The analitical determinations were 13,475. C
MVD was defined by the appearance of at least two tests with at least
two of the following symptoms: fever, leukopenia, hepatitis, pneumonit
is or intestinal damage without other etiology. 26 patients (17.2%) su
ffered disease, and in 17 of them (65%) CMV was detected in buffy coat
, urine and serum. Antigenemia was the first positive test detected an
d seroconversion by FC assay the last one (42 +/- 19 vs 93 +/- 54 days
post-transplant, p <0.007). It wes also the most sensitive (84.2%). I
nfection was detected before or at the same time than clinical symptom
s in 22 patients (85%), Antigenemia was also the test that more frecue
ntly preceded the appearance of clinical symptoms (in 16 patients, 67%
, 12 +/- 13.7 days, 0-55). In conclusion, the protocolized screening o
f renal transplant patients afford us to diagnose cytomegalovirus infe
ction before the appearance of clinical symptoms in the mayority of pa
tients. This allows faster implementation of therapeutic or prophylact
ic measures. In our study, antigenemia proved to be the most useful te
st.