J. Egberts et al., COMPARISON OF PROPHYLAXIS AND RESCUE TREATMENT WITH CUROSURF IN NEONATES LESS-THAN 30 WEEKS GESTATION - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL, Pediatrics, 92(6), 1993, pp. 768-774
ABSTRACT. Objective. The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to
evaluate the immediate effects of prophylactic administration of Curos
urf and to compare outcomes after prophylactic or expectant management
. Study design. Porcine surfactant (Curosurf, 200 mg/kg body weight) w
as administered intratracheally within 10 minutes of birth to preterm
neonates with a gestational age of 26 to 29 weeks (n = 75); rescue-eli
gible neonates (n = 72) were initially subjected to a sham maneuver. T
he primary end points of the trial, evaluated at the age of 6 hours, w
ere to obtain (1) a 40% decrease in the ratio between transcutaneous o
xygen tension (tcPO2) (kPa) and fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2), an
d (2) a 50% decrease in the incidence of radiologically verified respi
ratory distress syndrome (RDS). After 6 to 24 hours, a similar dose of
surfactant was given to the neonates of both the prophylaxis and the
rescue-eligible group, if they needed mechanical ventilation with an F
IO2 greater-than-or-equal-to 0.6. Results. At 6 hours the prophylaxis
group had, in comparison with the rescue-eligible group, significantly
higher tCPO2/FIO2 ratios (mean +/- SD: 39.7 +/- 15.3 vs 28.1 +/-18.1;
P <.001) and less severe RDS by radiological scoring (chi2 = 14.9; P
=.005). Severe RDS was present in 19% of the prophylactically treated
neonates versus 32% in the rescue-eligible group (P < .05). The prophy
laxis group needed shorter periods of FIO2 > 0.40 than the rescue-elig
ible neonates (P < .01), and eight neonates of the prophylaxis group (
11%) versus 23 of the rescue-eligible group (32%) qualified for rescue
treatment with surfactant in the interval 6 to 24 hours (P < .01). Th
ere were no differences in the incidence or severity of pneumothorax,
pulmonary interstitial emphysema, cerebral hemorrhage, periventricular
leukomalacia, patent ductus arteriosus, in the duration of mechanical
ventilation or time in supplemental oxygen, or in mortality. Conclusi
ons. Subgroup analysis revealed (1) that administration of corticoster
oids reduced the risk of developing neonatal RDS as effectively as did
surfactant prophylaxis at birth, and (2) that prophylaxis was effecti
ve especially in neonates with gestational age <28 weeks or birth weig
ht <1000 g, in male neonates, and in neonates who had received no ante
natal treatment with corticosteroids. Our data indicate that prophylac
tic treatment with surfactant should be considered in high-risk neonat
es fulfilling these latter criteria.