NEUROTOXIC EFFECT OF THE ANTI-HIV DRUG D-ASPARTATE BETA-HYDROXAMATE FOR RAT PRIMARY NEURONAL CULTURES - ATTENUATION BY N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE(NMDA) ANTAGONISTS
Bp. Lockhart et al., NEUROTOXIC EFFECT OF THE ANTI-HIV DRUG D-ASPARTATE BETA-HYDROXAMATE FOR RAT PRIMARY NEURONAL CULTURES - ATTENUATION BY N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE(NMDA) ANTAGONISTS, Brain research, 630(1-2), 1993, pp. 32-40
The anti-tumor drug D-aspartate beta-hydroxamate (D-AbetaH), selective
ly destroys HIV-1 infected peripheral blood mononuclear cells, but pro
duces anorexia and nausea during prolonged treatment to AIDS patients.
Consequently, based on the structural similarity between D-AbetaH and
the excitotoxins L-aspartate and NMDA, we have investigated the poten
tial neurotoxic action and pharmacology Of D-AbetaH and of a series of
chemically related anti-tumor drugs on rat primary neuronal/glial cul
tures. In this aim, after a 30 min exposure to D-AbetaH (1-2 mM), cort
ical neurons were selectively destroyed within 24 h. The stereoisomer
L-AbetaH (0.5-2 mM) was highly neurotoxic for both glial and neuronal
cells in mixed cultures but demonstrated no toxicity in glial cell cul
tures alone. Furthermore, for a series of D-AbetaH analogues, VHS.121
and VHS.122 demonstrated a reduced but significant neurotoxicity, wher
eas VHS. 124 and VHS. 125 showed no significant neurotoxic effect, and
in the case of VHS.125 also prevented D-AbetaH and glutamate-mediated
neurotoxicity. The related anti-tumor drugs L- or D-glutamate gamma-m
onohydroxamate or keto-glutamate gamma-monohydroxamate (less-than-or-e
qual-to 2 mM) were not neurotoxic for cortical neurons. The neurotoxic
effect Of D-AbetaH and L-AbetaH was attenuated by the NMDA antagonist
s MK-801, TCP, memantine, ifenprodil, pentamidine and CGS-19755. Alpha
-Difluoromethylornithine, an inhibitor of polyamine biosynthesis, also
protected cultures against the neurotoxicity Of L-AbetaH and D-AbetaH
. The pha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate (AMPA)/kainat
e receptor antagonist, CNQX only partially delayed L-AbetaH and D-Abet
aH neurotoxicity. These data suggest that the neurotoxic effect Of L-A
betaH and D-AbetaH is mediated primarily via a NMDA receptor-induced e
xcitotoxic effect. However, it is not fully established whether the si
de-effects observed during D-AbetaH treatment are related exclusively
to its neurotoxic action in vitro. The co-administration of D-AbetaH w
ith clinically tolerated NMDA antagonists or the use of amino acid bas
ed anti-tumor drugs lacking a neurotoxic effect, could eliminate some
of the drug-related side effects, and may represent a novel therapeuti
c strategy in the treatment of AIDS.