Rs. Kaplan et M. Sinaki, POSTURE TRAINING SUPPORT - PRELIMINARY-REPORT ON A SERIES OF PATIENTSWITH DIMINISHED SYMPTOMATIC COMPLICATIONS OF OSTEOPOROSIS, Mayo Clinic proceedings, 68(12), 1993, pp. 1171-1176
Back supports are often used to minimize or prevent complications of o
steoporosis. Nevertheless, the few related studies to date reveal that
the currently available thoracolumbar and lumbosacral supports have s
ubstantial limitations, including (1) poor compliance because of disco
mfort or restricted motion, (2) expense, (3) unacceptable cosmetic and
aesthetic appearance, and (4) medical contraindications to the use of
rigid supports. We report the initial results of a clinical trial of
the Posture Training Support (a thoracolumbar support) in 29 women and
1 man with osteoporosis or osteopenia of the spine (ages 37 to 87 yea
rs), who were referred because of back pain or kyphosis. We hypothesiz
e that this inexpensive, unobtrusive device promotes improvement in po
sture and reduces back pain either by acting as a proprioceptive reinf
orcer or by producing a force posteriorly below the inferior angles of
the scapulae and thus decreasing the anterior compressive forces that
are commonly exerted on the spine. Among the 23 patients who reported
substantial back pain before use of the support, relief of the pain w
as ''significant'' in 17 and minimal in 6. Nineteen patients noted imp
rovement in their posture. No patient reported worsening of back pain
or posture, nor did any patient discontinue use of the device for cosm
etic reasons, discomfort, or other complaints. Four patients previousl
y could not tolerate other back supports, and 14 had previously used o
ther supports without substantial improvement. These preliminary resul
ts suggest that the Posture Training Support may be of considerable sy
mptomatic and prophylactic value to patients with osteoporosis who can
not tolerate conventional back supports.