This paper responds to the points raised by Professor Ruggeri. First,
it is shown that even if the alleged computational error did in fact o
ccur (which is unclear), its quantitative significance is trivial. Sec
ond, I argue that the more important issue is determining the appropri
ate methodological approach to tax incidence analysis when transfers a
re an important source of income. I point out the problem and inconsis
tencies raised by the conventional approach to sales tax incidence, an
d argue that Ruggeri's analysis does not help us resolve this issue.