Experimental psychologists regard the hypothesis that language influen
ces thought to be disconfirmed. In this paper, we examine (a) traditio
nal interpretations of the hypothesis, (b) the basis on which the disc
onfirmation rests, and (c) experimental evidence supporting effects of
language on memory, perception, problem-solving, and judgment. The pu
rpose of this analysis is to question the prevalent view that the lang
uage-thought hypothesis is disconfirmed as well as to motivate renewed
experimental interest, especially in the study of social cognition, w
here the social nature of thought is a primary assumption.