A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 3 OR 6 COURSES OF ETOPOSIDE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE METHOTREXATE AND VINCRISTINE OR 6 COURSES OF ETOPOSIDE AND IFOSFAMIDE INSMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER (SCLC) .1. SURVIVAL AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS
Nm. Bleehen et al., A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 3 OR 6 COURSES OF ETOPOSIDE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE METHOTREXATE AND VINCRISTINE OR 6 COURSES OF ETOPOSIDE AND IFOSFAMIDE INSMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER (SCLC) .1. SURVIVAL AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS, British Journal of Cancer, 68(6), 1993, pp. 1150-1156
A total of 458 eligible patients, from 21 centres, with histologically
or cytologically confirmed SCLC were allocated at random to three che
motherapy regimens, each given at 3-week intervals. In two regimens, e
toposide, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and vincristine were given fo
r a total of either three courses (ECMV3) or six courses (ECMV6). In t
he third regimen, etoposide and ifosfamide were given for six courses
(EI6). Patients with limited disease (56% of the total) also received
radiotherapy to the primary site after the third course of chemotherap
y in all three groups. A partial response occurred in 45% of 144 ECMV3
patients, 48% of 141 ECMV6, and 53% of 141 E16 patients assessed, and
a complete response in a further 15%, 9%, and 13% respectively, givin
g total response rates of 60%, 57%, and 67%, respectively. There was n
o overall survival advantage to any of the three regimens. At 1 year,
24%, 29%, and 30% of patients were alive, and at 2 years 7%, 8%, and 9
%, respectively. The median survival time was 7.4 months in the ECMV3
group, 8.6 months in the ECMV6 group and 8.8 months in the E16 group.
The individual factors: poor performance status, extensive disease, th
e presence of dysphagia and a raised white blood cell count on admissi
on adversely affected prognosis. The results do not exclude the possib
ility of a minor survival advantage with the two 6-course regimens. Th
e findings on quality of life are presented in the companion paper (MR
C Lung Cancer Working Party, 1993b).