Cj. Williams et al., MULTICENTER CROSS-OVER STUDY OF AMINOGLUTETHIMIDE AND TRILOSTANE IN ADVANCED POSTMENOPAUSAL BREAST-CANCER, British Journal of Cancer, 68(6), 1993, pp. 1210-1215
Trilostane and Aminoglutethimide, each given with a physiological repl
acement dose of hydrocortisone, were randomly allocated to 72 eligible
postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients; following treatment f
ailure on either drug the patient continued with the other drug, if in
a suitable clinical condition. Thirty-eight patients initially receiv
ed Trilostane of whom 19 subsequently received Aminoglutethimide; 34 p
atients initially had Aminoglutethimide and seven of these then receiv
ed Trilostane. Both groups of patients were comparable in all respects
. There was no difference in the objective response rate to either dru
g, Trilostane 11/38 = 29%, Aminoglutethemide 12/34 = 35%, nor in the a
verage time to disease progression for the two drugs, Trilostane 64 we
eks, Aminoglutethemide 68 weeks. Of the 26 patients who received both
drugs, four showed a response to both suggesting no cross resistance.
Side effects were seen to both drugs in approximately half of the pati
ents, but were mainly gastro-intestinal with Trilostane and rash and d
rowsiness with Aminoglutethimide. There was no evidence of cross over
patient susceptibility to side effects.