After more than 40 years the so-called Hurst effect remains an open pr
oblem in stochastic hydrology. Historically, its existence has been ex
plained either by preasymptotic behavior of the rescaled adjusted rang
e R(n), certain classes of nonstationarity in time series, infinite m
emory, or erroneous estimation of the Hurst exponent. Various statisti
cal tests to determine whether an observed time series exhibits the Hu
rst effect are presented. The tests are based on the fact that for the
family of processes in the Brownian domain of attraction, R(n)/((the
tan))1/2 converges in distribution to a nondegenerate random variable
with known distribution (functional central limit theorem). The scale
of fluctuation theta, defined as the sum of the correlation function,
plays a key role. Application of the tests to several geophysical time
series seems to indicate that they do not exhibit the Hurst effect, a
lthough those series have been used as examples of its existence, and
furthermore the traditional pox diagram method to estimate the Hurst e
xponent gives values larger than 0.5. It turned out that the coefficie
nt in the relation of R(n) versus n, which is directly proportional t
o the scale of fluctuation, was more important than the exponent. The
Hurst effect motivated the popularization of 1/f noises and related id
eas of fractals and scaling. This work illustrates how delicate the pr
ocedures to deal with infinity must be.